Op-Ed: When Holocaust analogies run amok
Published January 9, 2012
reminder of what was at stake when the Jewish state was created in
1948 in the aftermath of World War II and the Nazi Holocaust.
Israelis and Jews the world over knew that the survival of the
Jewish people depended on the ability to have a home to return to
after our near-ruinous encounter with European anti-Semitism.
There was also a time when the words “Hitler,” “Nazi” and “Gestapo”
were not thrown about recklessly, when images of the emaciated
inmates of Nazi concentration camps were a reminder not just to the
Jewish people but to all the world of the terrible turn of events
that led to the death of six million Jews and millions of others in
the Holocaust.
The uniqueness of the Holocaust was what made the State of Israel
such a powerful answer to those who had attempted to annihilate the
Jews. And its memory would ensure that the mass genocide that
befell European Jewry would never happen again. Indeed, the message
of “Never Again” redefined Jewish experience and peoplehood in the
latter half of the 20th century.
But over time we have found the need to remind others-and sometimes
ourselves-of the importance of this experience and of the need to
protect its memory from those who would distort it. That is why we
have felt it necessary to battle efforts to undermine or trivialize
the history of the Holocaust. It is why we have worked to expose
Holocaust deniers. And it is why we repeatedly speak out when the
Holocaust becomes grist for inappropriate comparisons, or when
terminology such as “Nazi” or “Hitler” are misused to wage
political attacks or are trivialized in popular culture.
Yet never did I think that we would have to speak out about the
abject trivialization of the Holocaust by a group of Jews living in
Israel. But that is exactly what happened this month, when a group
of Haredi Orthodox protested following efforts by secular Israelis
to roll back gender segregation on some bus lines by dressing up in
concentration camp garb and wearing yellow Stars of David inscribed
with the word “Jude.”
The scene in Jerusalem square was both an aberration and an
outrage. This was blatant, in-your-face Holocaust trivialization on
a level that until now we have rarely witnessed in Israeli
society.
For decades, Israelis and Jews around the world have worked to
protect the memory of the Holocaust. We built Yad Vashem in
Jerusalem. In the United States, we founded the Holocaust Memorial
Museum in Washington. Today there’s even a Holocaust memorial in
Berlin, Germany.
We worked hard with like-minded teous Gentiles and governments to
protect and preserve the sites in Europe most closely associated
with the Shoah, including the concentration camps, the deportation
sites, the mass graves and the evidence of once-thriving Jewish
communities. And we created and stressed educational efforts, such
as Echoes and Reflections-the multimedia Holocaust curriculum
developed by the Anti-Defamation League in partnership with Yad
Vashem and the USC Shoah Foundation Institute-to ensure that the
lessons of the Shoah are passed on to future generations.
We also battled efforts to undermine or trivialize the history and
memory of the Holocaust. The most pernicious form was Holocaust
denial, a form of anti-Semitism. But while the deniers remain
mostly on the fringes of society, we have found ourselves
increasingly engaged in a battle against a more subtle form of
trivialization borne of ignorance, forgetfulness and carelessness
about truth and memory.
For more than a decade, inappropriate and offensive comparisons to
the Holocaust have cropped up increasingly in the U.S. If you have
a falling out with someone, call them a Nazi. If you don’t like
someone’s political positions, accuse them of being like Hitler.
Political leaders have accused each other of using propaganda like
Goebbels or of “sending in the brownshirts.” Celebrities compare
their personal ordeals to those of Anne Frank, or in a traumatic
moment in their lives, make trite comparisons to Hitler or the
Holocaust.
As Jews, we have found ourselves needing to constantly raise our
voices against this kind of trivialization in an effort not only to
remind others of the pain and offensiveness of these remarks, but
also to protect the memory of the Holocaust, so that we do not wake
up one day to a world that no longer remembers the lessons of that
period-or, worse, is indifferent to them.
At a time when the trivialization of the Holocaust is booming
around the world, it is now becoming apparent that we also need to
do a better job of reminding ourselves and our children of the
importance of remembrance and of protecting the memory of those who
perished and the honor of those who fought to defeat the murderous
Nazis.
Israelis should no longer refer to other Israelis as “Nazis.”
Jewish settlers should know better than to shout “Nazi” against
Israeli soldiers (there primarily for the settler’s protection) in
the West Bank. The fact that some Israelis refer to the 1967 border
between Israel and the West Bank as “the Auschwitz border” shows
how far removed some Israelis and Jews have become from the true
horrors of the Shoah.
It is time for those who abuse the memory of the Holocaust,
particularly those in Israel, to understand that words have
consequences. This was one of the primary lessons of the
Holocaust-that hateful, bigoted words can lead to violent
acts.
Now that 70 years have passed, the danger is that an overuse of
words-and inapt comparisons-will contribute to a lessening of the
true impact and meaning of the Holocaust and, likewise, the memory
of one of the significant reasons why the Jewish State of Israel
was brought into being in the first place.