Archaeologists say Western Wall plan endangers site
Published February 9, 2016
Jewish worshippers draped in prayer shawls performing the annual Priestly Blessing during Sukkot at the Western Wall in the Old City of Jerusalem, Israel, Sept. 30, 2015. (Gil Cohen/AFP/Getty Images)
(JTA) — New construction aimed at providing a space for non-Orthodox prayer at the Western Wall would damage “the most important archaeological site for the Jewish people,” a group of Israeli archaeologists said.
In a letter to Benjamin Netanyahu, nine senior archaeologists urged the prime minister to abort plans for construction, the Times of Israel reported.
The proposed construction, which would expand an area south of the main Western Wall prayer site, providing access for mixed-gender prayer, is part of a compromise announced last week to resolve tensions between liberal Jews and Israel’s Orthodox establishment.
READ: Op-Ed: Why the Western Wall deal is a victory for now but not forever
The Western Wall, the retaining wall and last surviving remnant of the Second Temple, is the holiest site in Judaism. The Temple Mount where the First and Second Temples once stood, is one of Islam’s holiest sites and home to al-Aqsa Mosque. The area has been a flashpoint for Jewish-Muslim tensions, with rumors in October that Israel planned to change the status quo there sparking an ongoing upsurge of violence in the West Bank and Jerusalem.
READ: 3 maps that explain the Western Wall compromise
According to the Times of Israel, Dan Bahat, who excavated the Western Wall tunnels; Ronny Reich, head of the Archaeological Council of Israel, who exposed part of the paved road beneath Robinson’s Arch; Jerusalem Prize winner Gabriel Barkay, who directs the Temple Mount Sifting Project, and Israel Prize laureate Amihai Mazar were among the signatories to the letter.
The construction plan has been approved by the Western Wall Heritage Foundation, but been criticized by haredi Orthodox groups.
Palestinian Minister of Waqf and Religious Affairs Youssef Ideiss also objected to the plan, saying it would violate the status-quo agreement governing the Temple Mount area.
This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.
